Virtual Equivalents of Real Objects (VEROs): A proposal for a new type of museum collectibleDemonstration
Samuel Bolton, The Ohio State University, USA, Joe Cora, The Ohio State University, USA
Computer-rendered three-dimensional models provide a range of beneficial roles to museums. Massively multiuser online virtual worlds, created for entertainment and social networking, might provide an additional and complementary way for museums to use of 3D models. Currently, virtual-world goods make poor collectibles because they can be replicated many times by a service provider. This issue would be solved by Virtual Equivalents of Real Objects (VEROs), which would be created using 3D scans of rare or unique objects in the real world. In any VERO-supported software application, a VERO would exist as the single representative of a uniquely identified real object; they could not, by definition, be duplicated within a virtual-world setting. In this way, real-world collectability would be translated to virtual-world collectability.
VEROs are abstract entities that should not be confused with their 3D-model associates. A museums consortium could establish a service exchange for VERO assignment and transactions. The service exchange, which would operate under the auspices of the museums consortium, would also function to assure the authenticity of VEROs. VEROs would be sold to recover some or all of the expenses of 3D-model production. Recent technological advances are now enabling the mass production of 3D-model representations of real objects. Furthermore, large numbers of 3D models have already been generated from museums for the purpose of research and promoting collections. It would therefore not be difficult to populate the service exchange with models suitable for VEROs.
Andrade, B.T., O.R.P. Bellon, L. Silva, and A. Vrubel. 2012. Digital preservation of Brazilian indigenous artworks: Generating high quality textures for 3D models. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13, no. 1: 28-39.
Barnes, S.J. 2007. Virtual worlds as a medium for advertising. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 38, no. 4: 45–55.
Bhasin, R., W.J. Jang, and J.C. Haart. 2012. A parallel stereo reconstruction algorithm with applications in entomology (APSRA). Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, Conference volume 8290, doi:10.1117/12.905545.
Bruno, F., S. Bruno, G. De Sensi, L. Maria-Laura, S. Mancuso, and M. Muzzupappa. 2010. From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11, no. 1: 42-49.
Dawson, P., R. Levy, and N. Lyons. 2011. Breaking the fourth wall: 3D virtual worlds as tools for knowledge repatriation in archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 11, no. 3: 387-402.
Doerr, M., K. Tzompanaki, M. Theodoridou, Ch. Georgis, A. Axaridou, and S. Havemann. 2010. A repository for 3D model production and interpretation in culture and beyond.
Nguyen, C.V., D.R. Lovell, M. Adcock, and J. La Salle. 2014. Capturing natural-colour 3d models of insects for species discovery and diagnostics. PLoS ONE 9, no. 4: e94346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094346.
Pearce, S.M. 1995. On collecting: An investigation into collecting in the European tradition, London: Routledge.
Styliani, S., L. Fotis, K. Kostas, and P. Petros. 2009. Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage 10, no. 4: 520-528.
Swartout, W., D. Traum, R. Artstein, D. Noren, P. Debevec, K. Bronnenkant, J. Williams, A. Leuski, S. Narayanan, D. Piepol, C. Lane, J. Morie, P. Aggarwal, M. Liewer, J.-Y. Chiang, J. Gerten, S. Chu, and K. White. 2010. Ada and Grace: Toward Realistic and Engaging Virtual Museum Guides. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6356, ed. J. Allbeck, N. Badler, T. Bickmore, C. Pelachaud and A. Safonova, 286-300. Verlag: Springer.
Sylaiou, S., K. Mania, A. Karoulis, and M. White. 2010. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, no. 5: 243-253.
Wheeler, Q., T. Bourgoin, J. Coddington, T. Gostony, A. Hamilton, R. Larimer, A. Polaszek, M. Schauff, and M.A. Solis. 2012. Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy. Zookeys 209,193-202.
Wojciechowski, R., K. Walczak, M. White, and W. Cellary. 2004. Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D web technology, 135-144. New York: ACM.
Woods, E., M. Billinghurst, J. Looser, G. Aldridge, D. Brown, B. Garrie, and C. Nelles. 2004. Augmenting the science centre and museum experience. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, 230-236. New York: ACM.