Making, MOOCs and Meaningful MetricsPaper
Jean Cheng, Exploratorium, USA
What design principles and strategies encourage a deep learning experience for museum visitors, and how do those translate online? Can we leverage digital platforms in interesting and appropriate ways to create quality professional development and a sense of online community around tinkering and making? How do we measure effectiveness, especially on a massive scale?
In recent years, maker spaces have proliferated across many settings, including museums. Although making and tinkering are age-old human practices, their potential for engagement, innovation, playful exploration and creative inquiry make them especially attractive for free-choice learning environments.
For over a decade, the Exploratorium has been developing science-rich tinkering activities and offering in-person professional development. In 2014, the Exploratorium, one of only three museum partners on the Coursera learning platform, offered its first-ever tinkering MOOC (Massively Open Online Course), a six-week online participatory workshop aimed at formal and informal educators.
The course attracted 7,000 students from 150 countries, of which ~4,400 were active participants, resulting in 66,000 video views and 6,700 forum posts. Participants went well beyond the weekly assignments, initiating their own discussions, actively responding to others, seeking out other tinkering activities, and sharing their own skills and expertise.
In this paper and presentation, we'll share our experience designing and running the online course, as well as findings and insights from our post-course analysis and research.
Ackermann, E. (2004). “Constructing knowledge and transforming the world.” Chapter from A Learning Zone of One’s Own: Sharing Representations and Flow in Collaborative Learning Environments.
Campbell, J. (2013) “Beyond and between ‘traditional’ MOOCS: Agile and just-in-time learning project details,” MOOC Research Initiative report.
Dede, C. (ed.) (2006). Online Professional Development for Teachers.
Eynon, R. (2013) “Conceptualizing interaction and learning in MOOCS,” MOOC Research Initiative report.
Gutwill, J., N. Hido & L. Sindorf. (in review). “An evidence-based framework for observing learning during tinkering activities.”
Littlejohn, A. & C. Milligan. (2013) “Professional learning through massive open online courses,” MOOC Research Initiative report.
New York Hall of Science. (2013). Making Meaning. Report on the 2012 Making Meaning Symposium.
Papert, S. & I. Harel. (1991). Constructionism.
Parry, M. (2013). “A star MOOC professor defects—at least for now.” Chronicle of Higher Education.
Petrich, M., K. Wilkinson & B. Bevan. (2011) “It looks like fun, but are they learning?” Design, Make, Play Chapter 5.